Legal Opinion

Carter v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1960No. 34581PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an action brought in the district court for Lancaster County by Nettie Carter as guardian of Troy V. Carter, an incompetent person, .plaintiff, against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, a corporation, Roy Vermaas and Earl Vermaas, individually and doing business as Vermaas Service Station, Vermaas Service Station, Inc., a corporation, and United States Rubber Company, a corporation, defendants, to recover damages alleged by plaintiff to have been suffered by Troy V. Carter, resulting from a collision be tween an automobile, owned and operated by the defendant Roy…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Harsche v. CzyzNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Driekosen v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Van Auker v. Steckley's Hybrid Seed Corn Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Allen v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bland v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Davis v. Landis Outboard Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Luther v. PawlingNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Carter v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Carlson v. ChambersNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API