Carter v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.
The plaintiff, Nettie Carter, as the duly appointed guardian of Troy V. Carter, an incompetent person, brought this action in the district court for Lancaster County against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, a corporation, Roy Vermaas and Earl Vermaas, individually and doing business as Vermaas Service Station, Vermaas Service Station, Inc., a corporation, and United States Rubber Company, a corporation, defendants, to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by Troy V. Carter, resulting from a collision between an automobile, owned and operated by the defendant Roy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Plumb v. BurnhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Harsche v. CzyzNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Shiers Ex Rel. Shiers v. CowgillNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Thompson v. EdlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- Bishop Ex Rel. Bishop v. SchofieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bunselmeyer v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- Whitaker v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN. INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- White v. LongoNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Kloewer v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Wyatt v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.