American Sugar Refining Co. v. Delaware, L. & W. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Actions by the American Sugar Refining Company against the Delaware. Lackawanna & Western Railway Company and the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.
1Opinion of the Court
RELDSTAB, District Judge.
These actions were decided in favor of the defendants at the conclusion of the argument. At that time the court stated some of the reasons which influenced its judgment, offering to file a written memorandum, if counsel so desired. The following is in response to the request for such memorandum, and contains the result of the court’s additional reflection, as well as some of the reasons that appeared to be controlling at the time of such decision.
These actions were tried together before the court, without a jury, and are to recover an allowance of two cents per 100…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States Ex Rel. Pitcairn Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Louisiana & P. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCommerce Court · 1913
- Pennsylvania R. v. M. McGirr's Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915
- G. Ittenbach Co. v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932