Legal Opinion

FA Richard and Associates v. Millard

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 11, 1993No. 01-93-00185-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

We must decide whether a plaintiff can sue the defendant for bad driving and sue the defendant's insurance adjuster simultaneously for bad faith. 1 Relator, F.A. Richard and Associates (Richard), requests a writ of mandamus to compel respondent, the Honorable Richard W. Millard, to vacate his order denying Richard’s “Motion for Protection/Severance and Plea in Abatement.”

Jo Ann Holton sued James Gallery, Highlands Insurance Company, and Richard. Holton asserts Gallery drove his vehicle into hers. Highlands is Gallery’s insurer, and Richard is an independent adjuster…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Womack v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Iley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Millard, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Liberty National Fire Insurance Co. v. AkinTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In re ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hunter, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  4. Lusk v. Puryear, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  5. Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. Lerner, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API