Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Button's Estate

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1937No. 26489. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1DissentBlake, J.

The issue raised by this appeal is the applicability of the inheritance tax statute to a gift made by Carrie C. Button to Helen McKinstry, the appellant.

In 1926, Mrs. Button, then eighty-four years of age, removed from her home in Illinois to Seattle. From the time of her removal there until her death, she lived with her niece, Hazel McKinstry. Mrs. McKinstry and ten brothers, children of a deceased sister, were Mrs. Button's sole living blood relatives. In 1928, she transferred her entire property, securities of the value of seventy thousand dollars, to Seattle and, later in the year,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Milliken v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Katz v. HerrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  4. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Armstrong v. State ex rel. KlausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HanlenWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. In Re Lowengart's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Taylor v. PembertonWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re Case's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In Re Colman's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API