Legal Opinion

Dohrman v. Durston

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1949No. Civ. No. 16671PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

Plaintiff, as the assignee of one L. S. Hutchinson, hereinafter referred to as “mortgagor,” instituted the present action to, recover the value of certain personal property described as “1 Caterpillar, Model D8” etc., and “1 Woolridge Scraper” etc., alleged to have been converted by the defendants Durston and Spicer, the latter claiming under a chattel mortgage from Hutchinson. It appears that prior to October 29, 1945, Hutchinson had borrowed $15,000 at the *237Bank of America which loan was guaranteed by Spicer. On December 21, 1945, by way of a settlement between Hutchinson and Spicer, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Copren Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. Metheny v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Sherlock v. Alturas State BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parrish v. GrecoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Peterson Tractor Co. v. Cal-West Equipment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Stolk v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API