Stolk v. Lucas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AGEE, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal by plaintiff and cross-defendant from a judgment decreeing that she owns one-half and defendants and cross-complainants, husband and wife, own the other half of a house and lot as tenants in common and that defendants and cross-complainants own certain household furnishings in which plaintiff and cross-defendant has no interest. The judgment ordered that the house be sold and the proceeds divided. The judgment also provided that cross-defendant Neil Stolk has no interest in any of the property involved. He has not appealed.
The main issue on this appeal is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Chapman v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.