Legal Opinion

Stolk v. Lucas

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1956No. Civ. 17006Published

1Opinion of the Court

AGEE, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal by plaintiff and cross-defendant from a judgment decreeing that she owns one-half and defendants and cross-complainants, husband and wife, own the other half of a house and lot as tenants in common and that defendants and cross-complainants own certain household furnishings in which plaintiff and cross-defendant has no interest. The judgment ordered that the house be sold and the proceeds divided. The judgment also provided that cross-defendant Neil Stolk has no interest in any of the property involved. He has not appealed.

The main issue on this appeal is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Chapman v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API