Legal Opinion

Stankic v. City of Sandusky, Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 19, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00080Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION IGOR STANKIC, CASE NO. 3:23-CV-00080-DAC Plaintiff, MAGISTRATE JUDGE DARRELL A. CLAY vs. MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER CITY OF SANDUSKY, OHIO, BRETT J. BIRD, DANNY J. LEWIS, Defendants. In this case before me pursuant to consent of the parties (see

28 U.S.C. § 636

and ECF # 20), Defendant City of Sandusky seeks dismissal of Plaintiff Igor Stankic’s Second, Third, and Fourth causes of action. (ECF #12). For the reasons that follow, I GRANT the City’s motion and dismiss the Second, Third, and Fourth causes of action.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Gregory v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API