Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Wyeth

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 2004No. MDL NO. 1203; Civ.A. 03-20626PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND PRETRIAL ORDER NO. _

BARTLE, District Judge.

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

The issue before the court is whether each plaintiff whose claims have been severed in a multi-plaintiff action must pay the $150 filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).

*541The undersigned is overseeing the nationwide class action settlement as well as the multidistrict litigation involving Wyeth’s diet drugs Pondimin and Redux which were withdrawn from the market in September, 1997. Under the court approved nationwide class action Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”), a Trust funded by Wyeth1 was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. DIRECTV v. LoussaertDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Diet DrugsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API