(HC) Rogers v. Lynch
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAURICE DIAUNDRA ROGERS, No. 2:23-cv-0238 DJC KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JEFF LYNCH, 15 Respondent. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Respondent filed a motion to 19 dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus because it contains an unexhausted claim. In 20 response, petitioner filed motions for stay and abeyance, to dismiss the unexhausted claim, and to 21 file an amended petition. As discussed below, it is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wilson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.