Pratt v. Phelps
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment oic the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order refusing a new trial. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
On January 2, 1908, the defendants and respondents herein, T. M. Phelps and W. H. Collins, executed their promissory note in the sum <:£ one thousand two hundred dollars to one H. W. Conger, On the death of Conger this action was commenced upon the note by the administrator of his estate, to recover an alleged unpaid balance of principal and interest aggregating the sum of -:ix hundred dollars. Subsequent to the distribution of Congers estate Elizabeth Conger Pratt, the sole distributee, was substituted as plaintiff in the action, and thereafter, upon a trial, a judgment was entered in favor…
2Cited by5 opinions
- St. Louis. S. F. R. Co. v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Spreckels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Edmunds v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Humes v. HumesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. LockhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962