Legal Opinion

United States v. Doe & Corporations

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2016No. Nos. 16-50234; 16-55640PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

1. Under Perlman v. United States, 247 U.S. 7, 38 S.Ct. 417, 62 L.Ed. 950 (1918), we have jurisdiction to review the order requiring production of documents entered on June 27, 2016. Because appellants’ former attorneys would likely produce the allegedly privileged documents to the government rather than risk a contempt citation, appellants may appeal the order to protect the privilege. See United States v. Krane, 625 F.3d 568, 572 (9th Cir. 2010). We lack jurisdiction over all other orders appellants challenge.

2. Appellants argue that the district court erred by not revisiting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. United States v. Kory Ray SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. In Re Richard Roe, Inc., and John Doe, Inc. United States of America v. Richard Roe, Inc. Richard Roe John Doe, Inc. And John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Julian OmidiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API