Legal Opinion

Wolters v. Rossi

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1899No. S.F. No. 1277PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. J. B. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

—The appellants recovered a judgment in the superior sourt against the respondent, Charles Rossi, June 39, 1894, for the sum of sixteen hundred and forty-three dollars and costs, and thereafter, under proceedings supplementary to execution thereon, an examination of the judgment debtor and of his wife, Lena Eossi, was had before a referee appointed therefor by the court. At this examination it was shown that about the twenty-eighth day of February, 1895, the judgment debtor had given to his wife moneys amounting to sixteen hundred and fifty-two dollars and nineteen cents, which he transferred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Judson v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Windhaus v. BootzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Page v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Page v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Goldborten v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Consolidated Construction Co. v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Wright v. SalzbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API