Legal Opinion

Brown v. Mulanax

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided April 30, 1991No. 12-91-00088-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

BILL BASS, Justice.

This original mandamus proceeding arises out of the failure of the Respondent, the Honorable Virgil Mulanax, to recuse himself pursuant to Tex.Gov’t Code Ann. § 74.053(b) 1 as a visiting judge in cause no. 90-1-23 in the Second District Court, Cherokee County, Texas, styled “John Ament vs. Texas National Bank of Jacksonville, N.A., Edwin Brown and Wayne Brown. ” We will conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.

At 9:00 a.m. on February 19, 1991, one hour before Respondent was scheduled to conduct his first hearing in the above named action, Relator Wayne…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Davis v. JefferiesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. W. C. Turnbow Petroleum Co. v. FultonTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Lewis v. Leftwich, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Frank v. Corbett, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Ater, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  2. Garcia v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. LanfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Coker v. WeathereadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Houston General Insurance Co. v. Ater, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API