Legal Opinion

Brendsel v. Wright

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 13, 1974No. 44490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Harold Brendsel, commenced this action for damages alleging fraud in the sale to him of 20 calves by defendant, Clarence Wright. Plaintiff alleged that defendant represented that the calves were healthy at the time of the sale when, in fact, they were not. At the close of all the evidence, the trial court decided that the case should be submitted to the jury on the theory of breach of implied warranty, instead of fraud, and granted plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint to that effect. Defendant claimed prejudice in allowing the amendment and in the submission of the case to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Raspler v. SengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StonebrakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Chan v. KatzenmeyerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Johns v. Harborage I, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API