Legal Opinion

Boren v. Henkel Corporation

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 30, 2024No. 4:23-cv-01605Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DAVID BOREN, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 4:23-cv-01605-SRC v. ) ) HENKEL CORPORATION et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Memorandum and Order Disappointed that he bought fabric softener insufficient to wash 120 full loads of laundry, David Boren alleges that Henkel deceived and cheated him. Boren seeks to vindicate his rights and those of his fellow fabric-softener purchasers whom he claims Henkel also deceived. Hoping to defend its packaging practices, Henkel…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Vicki Westcott, Administratrix of the Estate of Arden Westcott, Deceased v. City of Omaha, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Reynolds v. DormireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Ebner v. Fresh, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API