Enlow v. Hawkins
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Edwards district court; Charles E. Lobdell, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opiniofi of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
This was an action by Miley Hawkins to recover from A. Enlow $3000 as damages for the malicious destruction of corn. In his petition Hawkins alleged that in September, 1902, he purchased seventy-five acres of standing corn from Enlow and another, to be cut and shocked upon the land where it was grown, there to remain as late as April 15, 1903. It was purchased by Hawkins for the purpose of winter-feeding 500 head of cattle that he *634owned, and Enlow knew the purpose for which the purchase was made. Hawkins cut and shocked the corn, which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. KirbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Derby v. FlitnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Hoge v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Hawthorne v. SiegelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Mann v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Henderson v. ColemanWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
- Billups v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Peterson v. BacharSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Parish v. Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Skinner v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.