United States Department of Justice v. Daniel Chapter One
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.
In 2008, the Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint against *22Daniel Chapter One and its “Overseer,” James Feijo, which accused the defendants of using deceptive and unfair acts and practices to…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Galvin, Paula J. v. Eli Lilly & CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Grantham v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Sabra v. PompeoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020