Legal Opinion

Thiebaud v. Union Furniture Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1896No. 17,306PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Erom the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This was an action brought by appellee to enforce the specific performance of a contract, claimed to have been made by appellants to pump water for appellee, whenever requested, with damages as an incident for an alleged failure to do so on demand.

The contract in suit is contained in a deed by which certain described lands are conveyed to appellants, including in the tract so conveyed “that part of lot 6 in the city of Vevay,” on which the well in question is located. In this deed there is a reservation to appellee of the right to the use and withdrawal of water from said well, for appellee’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ikerd v. BeaversIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BodenschatzIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Lindsay v. GlassIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Case of ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1821

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Columbia Club, Inc. v. American Fletcher Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Leach v. RainsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Moseley v. BishopIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. State ex rel. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Smith, Etc. v. General Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API