Legal Opinion

Norman v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1987No. C9-86-1838PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

The Commissioner of Public Safety appeals the trial court finding that exclusion of Class C licenses from the limited license privileges granted by Minn.Stat. § 171.30, subd. 3 (1984), violates the state and federal constitutions. We reverse.

FACTS

On May 14, 1986, Paul Norman refused alcohol concentration testing, and the Commissioner of Public Safety revoked his Class C 1 driver’s license for one year. He immediately re-took the written and driving portions of his test and requested a limited license for work purposes. A Commissioner’s representative informed him that,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MosengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. State Department of Highways v. NormandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Hintz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Saliterman v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Stoffel v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vang v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Vang v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API