Legal Opinion
Morganelli v. City of Derby
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 28, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The record discloses that proceedings for the recovery of compensation were begun by Matteo Morganelli in his lifetime, and that before the commissioner made his finding and award Morganelli died. The commissioner correctly held that all compensation accrued and matured during his lifetime would belong to his estate; he therefore entitled all the proceedings as those of the Estate of Matteo Morganelli. The record does not disclose the name of the administrator. See Bassett v. Stratford Dumber Co., ante, p. 297, 135 Atl. 574.
The estate of Matteo Morganelli under that title, is not a proper…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Thompson v. TwissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Alexander v. R. A. Sherman's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Aisenberg v. Adams Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Bassett v. Stratford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Jack and Jill, Inc. v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Welz v. ManzilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Spring Brook Farm Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Tortorici v. Sharp Moosop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.