Legal Opinion

Geer v. Cox

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 3, 2003No. 01-2583-JARPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND STRIKE

ROBINSON, District Judge.

In a “Class Action and Derivative Complaint” (“Complaint”), plaintiff, as a shareholder of TransFinancial Holdings, Inc. (“TransFinancial”), seeks to assert derivative causes of action concerning the liquidation sale of assets by Crouse Cartage Company (“Crouse”), a subsidiary of TransFinancial, to RLR Investments and R & L Transfer (“R & L”). All of the proceeds from the sale were paid to Crouse’s secured creditors, Central States Pension Funds (“Pension Fund”)…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Dorato ex rel. Wrongful Death Claim of Tillison v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  3. Williams v. McGreevey (In Re Touch America Holdings, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  4. Stubbs v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  5. Becher v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API