Legal Opinion
Fisher v. City of Syracuse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 12, 1974No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants seek damages for the diminution % value of their properties and for the increased expense of maintaining them which they allege result from the acts of the City of Syracuse.
The properties are located within an area approved for urban renewal as a part of the city’s general neighborhood renewal plan. They were subsequently designated for acquisition by the Common Council. Although the plan was adopted more than 10 years ago, the properties have not been taken and it is claimed that substantial damage has resulted during the interim from this threat of condemnation. Special Term held…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Maurice M. Sayre, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Liberty Mortgage Corporation v. The City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Fisher v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hempstead General Hospital v. WhalenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Thompson v. Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1980
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Broadway 41st Street Realty Corp. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Bowers v. County of EssexNew York Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.