Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Knudtson Land Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1910PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from District Court, McLean county; Winchester, J. Action by Fred Mitchell against the Knudtson Land Company and another. Judgment- for plaintiff, -and defendants appeal. Memorandum of sale must disclose the parties to the contract. Wood on Statute of Frauds, 693 Sec. 358; Browne on Statute of Frauds, 471; White v. Breen, 32 L. R. A. 127; Louisville v. Lofick, 2 L. R. A. 212, and note; Beckwith v. Talbott, 24 L. Ed.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, McLean county; Winchester, J. Action by Fred Mitchell against the Knudtson Land Company and another. Judgment- for plaintiff, -and defendants appeal. Memorandum of sale must disclose the parties to the contract. Wood on Statute of Frauds, 693 Sec. 358; Browne on Statute of Frauds, 471; White v. Breen, 32 L. R. A. 127; Louisville v. Lofick, 2 L. R. A. 212, and note; Beckwith v. Talbott, 24 L. Ed. (U. S.) 496, Grafton v. Cummings, 25 L. Ed. 366.' > Connection of several writings to make a contract, must be shown on their face. Tice v. Freeman, 15 N. W. 674; Morton v.…

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.

This is an action for the specific performance of a contract for the purchase of real estate. The complaint alleges that the Knudtson Land Company is a corporation organized under the laws of Minnesota. In the negotiation of the contract, the Casey Land Company acted as the agent of the plaintiff, and the defendant, O. A. Knudtson, acted as the agent of the defendant corporation. The contract relied on in the complaint was entered into through telegrams and letters, and some of these letters and telegrams are set forth in the complaint to show that a contract was entered into through such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanson v. SvarverudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Erdahl v. HeggNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Heuer v. HeuerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Matrix Properties Corp. v. TAG INVESTMENTSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Shenners v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API