Legal Opinion

Jill S. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., and Cash Equivalent Fund

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 7, 1991No. 89-2967PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

The Supreme Court remanded this case with instructions to decide whether, under federal law reflecting the law of Maryland, Kamen has established adequate reason for not making a demand on the directors of the Cash Equivalent Fund. — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1711, 1722-23 & n. 10, 114 L.Ed.2d 152 (1991). Kamen’s request that we allow the district court to resolve that question in the first instance is inconsistent with both the Supreme Court’s instructions and her argument to the Supreme Court that we erred in declining to apply Maryland law. (We had declined, 908 F.2d…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Pogostin v. RiceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Werbowsky v. CollombCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Werner Frank and Werner Frank Enterprises, Inc. v. Hadesman and Frank, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Listecki Ex Rel. Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Cemetery Perpetual Care Trust v. Official Committee of Unsecured CreditorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Boland v. EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API