Legal Opinion

Aitken v. Gill

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1985No. 15268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether an action brought by sellers of real property, seeking to reform the instruments of conveyance, was time-barred under the applicable statute of limitation. The district court held that it was not and granted the relief sought. For reasons explained below, we vacate the judgment and remand the case.

The facts essential to our decision are undisputed. In 1962 Stewart and Grace Aitken sold land near Riggins, Idaho, to Deward and Dolina Gill. The buyers believed that the sale included approximately seventeen acres known as “Rocky Flat.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Reis v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Black Leaf Products Co. v. Chemsico, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Nancy Lee Mines, Inc. v. HarrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Collins v. ParkinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Belk v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brown v. GreenheartIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Ranger Insurance v. Globe Seed & Feed Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Jay Brown v. Auga GreenheartIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Ranger Insurance v. Globe Seed & Feed Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API