Legal Opinion

Hardin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 3, 2015No. 15-426CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Plaintiff; Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction; Frivolous Complaint; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); “Three-Strikes” Rule; Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

Plaintiff Denny-Ray Hardin, proceeding pro se, alleges that he was unjustly convicted and unlawfully incarcerated by the federal government. Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff moves for a default judgment against defendant and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis.. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss, grants…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bobka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Mendiola v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Emiabata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Nottage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API