Hardin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Pro Se Plaintiff; Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction; Frivolous Complaint; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); “Three-Strikes” Rule; Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Plaintiff Denny-Ray Hardin, proceeding pro se, alleges that he was unjustly convicted and unlawfully incarcerated by the federal government. Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff moves for a default judgment against defendant and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis.. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss, grants…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bobka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Mendiola v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Emiabata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Nottage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.