Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Marshall v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 10, 1931No. 13056Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Cothran

(concurring in result) : These two cases, commenced in February, 1928, were tried together by agreement, at the fall term, 1929, before his Honor, Judge Grimball, and a jury. Fie directed a verdict in each case in favor of the defendant. From the judgments entered thereon the plaintiffs respectively have appealed. The appeals were heard together in this Court and will be so considered.

The appeals involve identical issues, except that the plaintiff Stuart raises a point that is not raised in the case of Marshall; what shall be said in reference to the Marshall appeal will apply to the Stuart…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing MacHine Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Moore v. Security Trust & Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Arentz v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API