Legal Opinion
Weglarz v. Bruck
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 4, 1984No. 83—1342, 83—1343, 83—1344, 83—1399 consPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson
Theodore J. Bruck, defendant, brings this consolidated interlocutory appeal, seeking reversal of four separate orders of the trial court. The numerous issues which have been raised on appeal may be summarized as follows: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion in disqualifying the firm of Konewko, Drenk and Thompson as attorneys for defendant, and (2) whether Douglas Drenk, defendant’s attorney, was properly held to be in contempt of court.
We affirm.
The plaintiffs are Jacob Weglarz, Cynthia Weglarz, I-Del, Inc., and Conteco Company. Defendant Bruck and plaintiff Jacob Weglarz…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Novo Terapeutisk Laboratorium A/s v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Gist-Brocades Fermentation Industries, Inc., and Gist-Brocades N. V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- People v. JashunskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Skokie Gold Standard Liquors, Inc. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Schwartz v. CortelloniIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. LawsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- McCall v. District Court for the Twenty-First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Herbes v. GrahamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Richard B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.