Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Horowitz
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 21, 1984No. A012244PublishedCited by 4 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
Introduction
Seymour Horowitz appeals, and Sarah Miriam Kline Horowitz cross-appeals, from certain property and support provisions of the interlocutory judgment of dissolution of their marriage. We reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings.
The parties married in 1961 and separated in 1978. There are two children of the marriage, one born in 1962 and the other in 1964. Sarah filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in 1978. In the interlocutory judgment of dissolution, filed September 5, 1980, the court characterized and divided numerous items of real…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- In Re Marriage of TammenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- In Re Marriage of BosemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BergmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Marriage of HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Malmquist v. MalmquistNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Marriage of BergmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985