Legal Opinion

Hammill v. Matthew Cummings Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1942No. Appeal, 103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

Claimant’s husband, Charles H. Hammill, was an employee of the defendant, Matthew Cummings Company. He died on Saturday, Jnly 23, 1938, while lying on a sofa at his home, of a coronary thrombosis, which is, in the language of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, “the closure of the coronary artery of the heart, due to the pressure therein of a blood clot.”

The evidence produced showed that on July 13, 1938, the employee had been taken from his usual labor of wheeling bricks and tossing them up to the bricklayers, and, along with several other laborers, had been assigned to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Hoosca v. Lytle Coal CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fronko v. United States Sanitary Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Carl v. American Window Glass Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API