Dods v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[¶1] Timothy Dods appeals the denial of a motion to suppress evidence. Dods claims on appeal that a single instance of crossing a fog line does not create articulable suspicion to warrant a stop of his vehicle. We affirm.
*1209ISSUE
[¶2] Dods single issue is as follows:
Did the arresting officer possess sufficient facts to stop [Dods], and ultimately was there probable cause to search and seize [Dods] pursuant to Article 1 Section 4 of the Wyoming Constitution?
FACTS
[¶3] On May 26, 2008, State Trooper Karl Germain noticed a blue minivan traveling eastbound on Interstate 80 west of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Paul Charleston GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. OzbirnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Damato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Linzey Danielle SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Carl Wayne Allgier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Bradley Michael Elmore v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Dimino v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Hector Zapien-Galvan v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.