Dimino v. State

KITE, Chief Justice.

[11] After conditionally pleading guilty to possession with intent to deliver martjua-na, Carl Anthony Dimino challenges the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a search of his vehicle. He maintains that he was unconstitutionally detained for a drug dog sniff after a traffic stop and that the subsequent search of his vehicle was illegal. We affirm, con*741cluding the trooper had reasonable suspicion to detain him and the search was legal.

ISSUES

[12] Mr. Dimino states a single issue on appeal:

Did the trial court err in denying appellant's…