Legal Opinion

In re Spann

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided November 30, 1910No. 339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of Joseph T£. Spann. On petition to review a referee's order denying a petition of Smart Brothers & Company for the proceeds of certain shoes delivered to ihe bankrupt at an alleged fraudulent sale. Petition granted, and determination of referee set aside.

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

This is a petition to review the action of the referee in the matter which will fully appear from the following statement made by the referee on the petition to review his action :

“Smart Bros. & Co., creditors of the bankrupt, intervened in said cause in due time, setting up title to certain shoes to the value of $460.50, said shoes having been sold by Smart Bros. & Co. to J. E. Spann on June 13, 1010, and shipped by them on August 9, 1910, and received by the bankrupt and placed in his stock August 10, 1910; the date of receipt by the bankrupt being five days prior to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donaldson, Assignee v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Devoe v. . BrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Carter v. LipseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Crine & Daniel v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Quirk v. Municipal Assistance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Henry Siegel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1915
  2. In Re P. H. Krauss & Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924
  3. In re Spinks Drug Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1924
  4. In re WatmoughDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API