Legal Opinion

Augustus Hunt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 7, 1972No. 19564PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Appellant, Augustus Hunt, initiated a post-conviction proceeding by a pro se motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 which was denied. 1

Hunt was convicted of violations of Federal statutes arising out of an operation of a liquor distillery. 2 His convie- tions were affirmed by this court, 419 F.2d 1 (1969) cert. denied 397 U.S. 1016, 90 S.Ct. 1250, 25 L.Ed.2d 430 (1970).

Appellant now claims that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial prior to and after indictment. This issue was not raised before, during, or after trial, nor in the direct appeal.

The…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Albert N. Dukow, Appeal of Thomas S. Crow. Appeal of Saul BrourmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. United States v. Tarik Ali Bey A/K/A Warren L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. IvanovDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
  5. United States v. Roger A. MelnickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API