Legal Opinion
United States v. Wallace & Tiernan, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 30, 1964No. Crim. No. 784-64PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.
The defendants were indicted for having knowingly and willfully falsified and concealed material facts in a matter within the jurisdiction of an agency of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (1958). The case arose out of information submitted by the defendants to the Food and Drug Administration relating to Dornwal, a new tranquilizer. By means of a pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the special grand jury which returned it was illegally constituted, the defendants have raised a purely legal question of statutory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. CarperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
- United States v. PerlsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan, Inc., Robert T. Conner, Charles E. HoughCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965