United States v. Wallace & Tiernan, Inc., Robert T. Conner, Charles E. Hough
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellees were indicted for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. 1 Following their arraignment, at which they entered pleas of not guilty, appellees sought to have the indictment dismissed on the ground, among others, that the grand jury that returned it had not been convened in compliance with Section 2306 of Title 11 of the District of Columbia Code (Supp. IV, 1965) and that, therefore, its actions were a nullity The District Court granted their motions and dismissed the indictment on the theory that the grand jury had not been properly summoned. 234 F.Supp. 780 (D.D.C.1964). The United States…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Rasquin v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Nolan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- The People v. LieberIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- United States v. CarperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Hon. Judge Almeric L. ChristianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Joseph W. Shimon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. William BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- William Howard Tinch, Cross-Appellant v. Harry N. Walters, in His Official Capacity as Administrator of the Veterans Administration, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.