Legal Opinion
Hourigan v. Cassidy
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 2001No. 20,895PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Defendants (Cassidy and Kirkpatrick) appeal a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff on his claim for violation of his liberty interests. They contend that the trial court erred in denying their claim of qualified immunity. Further, they contend that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury verdict, that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence regarding incidents that were outside the complaint, and that the trial court erred in submitting a special verdict form that did not include a statement regarding proximate cause. Plaintiff cross-appeals.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Medina v. City & County DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Samuel Colaizzi and Samuel Indovina v. Daniel Walker, (Former) Governor of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Carolyn Clanton v. Jody CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American National Property & Casualty Co. v. ClevelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Kilgore v. FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- O'Neel v. USAA InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Starko, Inc. v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Leigh v. Village of Los LunasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.