Legal Opinion

Platt v. Platt

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1947No. 467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff sued in detinue to recover possession of an automobile which had been impounded by the police department following a collision. He named the property clerk of the police department as defendant. Thereupon his wife intervened in the case and made claim to the automobile as her property. Thus it became a contest between husband and wife, with the police department having no interest in the outcome. The evidence revealed many points of conflict. These we shall not attempt to list; we recite only the facts relating to the issues on this appeal.

Plaintiff testified…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. District Hauling & Construction Co. v. ArgerakisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Meyer v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Baker v. BerremanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Chambers v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  5. Schlessman v. BrainardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Imhoff v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Carr v. Dixie Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API