Legal Opinion

Schlessman v. Brainard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 26, 1939No. 14,386PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

The defendant in error, to whom we shall refer as plaintiff, instituted an action in the district court of the City and County of Denver against plaintiff in error, herein denominated defendant, for actual damages in the sum of $2,000 for injuries said to have been sustained as the result of an assault and battery allegedly committed upon him by defendant. It was further pleaded that defendant, in committing the alleged assault and battery, was guilty of wanton and reckless disregard of plaintiff’s rights and feelings, as a result of which plaintiff additionally prayed for exemplary damages…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. McConathy v. DeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Morgan v. GoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Buchanan v. BurgessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  5. People v. MorascoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mince v. ButtersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Julien v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hudson v. American Founders Life Ins. Co. of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  4. Aspen Skiing Co. v. PeerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Wickland v. SnyderColorado Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API