Legal Opinion

First Union National Bank v. Curtis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 21, 2005Published

1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.

[¶ 1] First Union National Bank appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Hjelm, J.). It contends that the court erred when it held that the Improvident Transfers of Title Act, 33 M.R.S.A §§ 1021-1025 (1999 & Supp 2004), impaired its mortgage in real estate. Because we agree, we vacate the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] In June 1998, Melissa Curtis was conveyed real property at 83 Fruit Street *797in Bangor subject to a life estate in her grandmother, Eleanor Reilly, who had lived there since 1978.1 Melissa and her husband, Richard, sought to mortgage the Fruit Street…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hills v. EliotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  2. City of Bangor v. Penobscot CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. Thompson v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  4. Lazarovitch v. TatilbumSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API