Legal Opinion · Dissent

Simmons v. Hertzman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1994No. C-930933Published

1DissentM.B. Bettman, Judge

As the majority acknowledges, Ohio recognizes a cause of action for wrongful pregnancy. In Johnson v. Univ. Hospitals of Cleveland (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 49, 540 N.E.2d 1370, the Supreme Court made it clear that wrongful pregnancy is a suit filed by a parent “for proximate damages arising from the birth of a child subsequent to a doctor’s failure to properly perform a sterilization procedure.” Id. at 51, 540 N.E.2d at 1372. In the context of this case, the appellant, Palmo Simmons, has brought a wrongful pregnancy action on his own behalf against defendant-appellee, Bernard Hertzman, M.D. 2 I…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Berdyck v. ShindeOhio Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API