State v. Hoer
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.
As the result of a bench trial, Christopher J. Hoer was convicted of possessing a controlled substance (methamphetamine) in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(3) (Cum. Supp. 1986). In his motion to suppress physical evidence, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-822 (Reissue 1985), Hoer claimed that methamphetamine obtained in a warrantless search of his automobile was inadmissible as the product of an unreasonable search and seizure contrary to the fourth amendment to the U.S. Constitution and article I, § 7, of the Nebraska Constitution. The court overruled Hoer’s suppression motion and, over Hoer’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SardesonNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. KonfrstNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. GerjevicNebraska Supreme Court · 1990