Legal Opinion

State v. Hoer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1989No. 88-469PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

As the result of a bench trial, Christopher J. Hoer was convicted of possessing a controlled substance (methamphetamine) in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(3) (Cum. Supp. 1986). In his motion to suppress physical evidence, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-822 (Reissue 1985), Hoer claimed that methamphetamine obtained in a warrantless search of his automobile was inadmissible as the product of an unreasonable search and seizure contrary to the fourth amendment to the U.S. Constitution and article I, § 7, of the Nebraska Constitution. The court overruled Hoer’s suppression motion and, over Hoer’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SardesonNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. KonfrstNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. GerjevicNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API