Legal Opinion
Schumann v. Curry
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided March 16, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The complainant seeks a decree of specific performance upon the following stipulation of facts:
"All of the allegations contained in the complaint except paragraph 1 are admitted by the defendants.
"Paragraph 1 of the complaint wherein it is alleged that on November 28th, 1936, complainant was seized in fee-simple of No. 28 Bleecker street, Jersey City, New Jersey, said premises being more particularly described in the complaint, is denied.
"On July 24th, 1911, Ferdinand Mathews and Mattie Mathews, husband and wife, were seized in fee-simple, as tenants by the entirety of the above described…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Enyeart v. KeplerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Schulz v. ZieglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Wortendyke v. RayotSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Bilder v. RobinsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
- Buttlar v. RosenblathSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Runco Et Vir v. OstroskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Grange v. GrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Craig v. CraigNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Lipps v. CroweNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953