Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Beemac Trucking, LLC

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 7, 2013No. Case No. 8:11CV8PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SMITH CAMP, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 149) filed by Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company (“UP”), and the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Beemac Trucking, LLC (“Bee-mac”) (Filing No. 147), and Defendants Landstar Ranger, Inc. (“Landstar”), and Edward Samuel Edling (“Edling”) (Filing No. 144). For the reasons discussed below, all three motions will be granted in part and denied in part.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Unless otherwise noted, the following facts are those that are stated in the parties’…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Starboard Holdings Ltd. v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
  2. Webster v. KestersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API