Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Passmore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1951No. 17314PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

Counsel for the Clerk of Council of the City of Atlanta contend in their brief that the zoning laws and ordinances of the city do not permit the operation of a tourist home in an area zoned for Ul, or residential purposes; and that the clerk, therefore, was not only not required, but not authorized, to issue the license applied for by Mrs. Passmore. It appears from the record that the zoning ordinances of the city fix a use of that class of property defined as Ul ás “dwellings.”

Section 93-204 of the city code is set forth in the response of the clerk, and is as follows:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Randall v. Atlanta Advertising ServiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Kitchens v. NolandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Thompson v. Glenwood Community Club Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Atlanta Ass'n of Baptist Churches v. CowanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. David v. BowenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Voyles v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Jordan v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Columbia Valley Recreation Center v. MassieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  4. Pritchett v. VickerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. Hood v. Winding-Vista Recreation, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API