Gess v. United States
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE ME NT, District Judge.
Before the court are Defendant United States of America’s (hereafter “United States”) motions to dismiss or, in the alternative, motions for summary judgment and the Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment. 1 Concomitantly, the United States submitted briefs in support of said motions. Plaintiffs filed responses and supporting briefs in opposition to the United States’ motions.
Because the motions involve similar issues and arise from the same set of facts, the court will consolidate the- motions and address them simultaneously. .…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Poarch v. Alfa Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Gess v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- Poarch v. Alfa Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000