Legal Opinion

Naumovich v. Reese

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1952No. 14506PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAMER, Justice.

Appellant has filed a strong motion for rehearing and after considering it we have decided to withdraw our former opinion and write anew in the case.

Appellant’s statement of the case, which appellee states is correct, is: “Appellees brought suit in the 14th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, against appellant, his son, Nickey Naumovich, and Pan-Aire, Inc., in the nature of a suit to set aside alleged fraudulent deeds of trust and chattel mortgages (executed by Nickey Naumovich and Pan-Aire, Inc., to Pera Naumovich to secure certain promissory notes) and prayed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colby v. McClendonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Farrell v. ComerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hollins v. Rapid Transit Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hollins v. Rapid Transit Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Broussard v. TianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Burgess v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Hollins v. Rapid Transit Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API