Legal Opinion

Goken v. Dallugge

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1904No. 13,404PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the district court for Butler county: Samuel H. Sornborger, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, C.

This is an action in which the defendant in error, as plaintiff in the court below', recovered a judgment in an action for damages against a husband and wife for an assault committed by the latter in the presence of the former, but without his instigation or consent and in disobedience to his expressed wishes. In the' view we have taken of the case, it is not necessary to state the facts in greater detail. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff, and there was a joint motion for a new trial, and also separate motions by each of the defendants and separate petitions in error.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. . QuannNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Martin v. RobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Norris v. CorkillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. Culmer v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Kerner v. McDonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Emerson v. Western Seed & Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Witte v. WitteNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Schuler v. HenrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Ala. Fuel & Iron Co. v. BaladoniAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Carnahan v. CummingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API