Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. Cummings

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1920No. 21144PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Api>eal from, the district court for Franklin county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge,

1Opinion of the CourtFlansburg, J.

Action in ejectment and for damages to the land. ' The strip of land in dispute lies along the boundary between the farm of plaintiff and that of defendant. Plaintiff sets up two causes of action: (1) To recover the land; and (2) for damages for alleged wrongful destruction by the defendant of trees upon the land. Defendant introduced no testimony and moved for a directed verdict, which motion was overruled. Plaintiff recovered a judgment on both causes of action, and defendant appeals.

*339Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to show title in the plaintiff.

Plaintiff owns the land…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Multer v. KnibbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Kellar v. JamesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Krumm v. PillardNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Rust-Owen Lumber Co. v. HoltNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McMurtry v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duke v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Barnes v. MilliganNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ohme v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. BachelorNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re Estate of LeboriusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API